Mai mult decat stabilitate primara. Noul standard conic.

Straumann® Bone Level Tapered Implant

 

Mai mult decat un implant conic. Perfectiune.

Implantul dentar Straumann® Bone Level Tapered ofera o stabilitate primara excelenta in os moale si alveole post-extractionale. Forma conica face o compresie adecvata a osteotomiei subpreparate (Fig. 1).
Va permite de asemenea sa controlati limitarile anatomice ale pacientului cum ar fi apexuri radiculare convergente, structura mandibulara concava sau creste inguste atrofiate (Fig.2).
 
Poza implant dentar Straumann Bone Level Tapered Poza implant dentar Straumann Bone Level Tapered Poza implant dentar Straumann Bone Level Tapered
Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Piesa de tranfer LoximTM

 

 

Folosind avantajele dovedite clinic ale caracterisiticilor implantului Straumann Bone Level, implantul Bone Level Tapered introduce combinatia puternica intre materialul Roxolid, suprafata SLActive, forma Bone Control Design, conexiunea CrossFit, diversitatea protetica ai corpul conic al implantului.

Bucurati-va de siguranta tratamentului oferita de beneficiile dovedite in timp- impreuna cu noul design conic apical care ofera o stabilitate primara excelenta chiar si in situatiile in care oferta de os este compromisa.

ROXOLID®- TRATAMENT MAI PUTIN INVAZIV FOLOSIND IMPLANTURI DE DIMENSIUNI MAI MICI

  • Mai multe optiuni de tratament, folosind implanturi mai mici
  • Conservarea crestei osoase si reducerea necesitatii procedurilor de grefare invazive (1,2)
  • Cresterea acceptantei pacientului prin folosirea procedurilor mai putin invazive (2)

SLActive®- PROIECTATA PENTRU MAXIMIZAREA SUCCESULUI SI PREDICTABILITATII TRATAMENTULUI

  • Tratament mai sigur si mai rapid in 3-4 saptamani pentru toate indicatiile (3-11)
  • Predictabilitate ridicata a tratamentului in protocoalele complicate (1, 13-16)
  • O plaja mai larga a optiunilor de tratament, cu o mai mare incredere in rezultate (1-16)

CONICITATEA APICALA- STABILITATE PRIMARA EXCELENTA CHIAR SI IN SITUATIILE DE OFERTA OSOASA SCAZUTA

  • Adancime maxima a filetului in zona apicala, pentru maximizarea angajarii implantului in osteotomie
  • Auto-taietor in siturile subpreparate
  • Protejarea structurilor anatomice prin varful rotunjit al implantului

COMPONENTELE PROTETICE ALE SISTEMULUI STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL

  • Restaurari singulare sau multi-unit: constructii insurubate sau cimentate
  • Tratamentul edentatiilor complete: solutii fixe sau mobilizabile
  • Solutii premium eficiente ca si costuri: folosind fie fluxuri conventionale, fie fluxuri digitale

CONCEPTUL BONE CONTROL DESIGN- O CONSERVARE OPTIMA A OSULUI CRESTAL

  • Respecta distantele si latimile biologice
  • Pozitie optima a interfetei intre suprafata lucioasa si cea rugoasa
  • Control al microgap-ului
  • Design biomecanic al implantului

CONEXIUNEA CrossFit®- MANIPULARE SIMPLIFICATA, CARACTERISTICA A INTREGII LINII BONE LEVEL

  • Manevrare mai usoara si incredere in pozitionarea componentelor
  • Precizie ridicata impotriva rotirii si stabilitate mecanica pe termen lung
  • Flexibilitate in alegerea tipului de restaurari

 

Mai mult decat predictibil. Convenabil si flexibil.

Procedura chirurgicala si selectia de produse devin mai flexibile prin folosirea implantului Bone Level Tapered (BLT).

Secventa de frezare adaptabila si noi instrumente

  • Secventa de frezare este adaptabila la situatia anatomica (conform densitatii osoase)
  • Toate instrumentele BLT pot fi identificate prin 2 inele de culoare si prin varful conic

Portofoliu larg de produse

Piesa de Transfer Loxim

  • Manipulare usoara datorita insertiei de tip snap-on
  • Plasare corecta a implantului datorita marcajelor adancimilor
  • Protectia configuratiei interne a implantului datorita punctului de rupere predeterminat

 

Descarcari

 

Studii

1 Benic GI et al. ‘Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.’ Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2013; [Epub ahead of print]  

2 Freiberger P, Al-Nawas B. ‘Non-interventional Study on Success and Survival of TiZr Implants.’ EAO 2012 Copenhagen; 305 Posters – Implant Therapy Outcomes, Surgical Aspects. 

3 Rupp F et al. : Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 76(2):323-334, 2006.  

4 DeWild M : Superhydrophilic SLActive® implants.Straumann document 151.52, 2005  

5 Maniura K : Laboratory for Materials – Biology Interactions Empa, St. Gallen, Switzerland Protein and blood adsorption on Ti and TiZr implants as a model for osseointegration. EAO 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting, October 17 – 19 2013, Dublin  

6 Schwarz F et al. : Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 35.1 (2008): 64– 75. 

7 Rausch-fan X et al. : Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dental Materials 2008 Jan;24(1):102-10. Epub 2007 Apr 27.  

8 Schwarz F et al. : Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA® titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11(4): 481-488, 2007.  

9 Lang, NP et al. : Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants.Res 22.4 (2011): 349–56. 

10 Raghavendra S et al. : Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2005 May–Jun;20(3):425–31. 

11 Oates TW et al. : Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA® surface: a randomized pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2007;22(5):755–760.  

12 Schwarz F et al. : Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86  

13 Lai HC et al. : Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2009;20(3):247–53.  

14 Buser D et al. : Stability of Contour Augmentation and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant-Supported Single Crowns in the Esthetic Zone: 3-Year Result of a Prospective Study With Early Implant Placement Post Extraction. J Periodontol. 2011 March; 82(3): 342-9.  

15 Buser D et al. : Long-term Stability of Early Implant Placement with Contour Augmentation. J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):176S-82S.  

16 Nicolau P et al. : Immediate and early loading of Straumann® SLActive implants: A Five Year Follow-up. Presented at the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration – 6-9 October 2010, Glasgow